<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: projects</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.datanode.net/?feed=rss2&#038;p=281" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.datanode.net/?p=281</link>
	<description>Where the totally inane meets the totally mundane</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 17:44:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.datanode.net/?p=281&#038;cpage=1#comment-82</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Sep 2006 13:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datanode.net/?p=281#comment-82</guid>
		<description>Perhaps all new projects should be forced to be named as beta?  I&#039;d say that every new project should have a development period, a public beta release period (maybe 3 months), and then an evaluation on if it should be continued as an official Gentoo project.

At the moment it seems as if everyone has a great idea, names it &quot;Gentoo This&quot; or &quot;Gentoo That&quot; and is able to launch it as a project.  The barrier to entry should be slightly higher and there needs to be an evaluation to see if it&#039;s just a waste of time and resources to continue the project.  If the project is just a small toy project for a few developers and has little use for anyone else then it shouldn&#039;t be an official Gentoo project.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps all new projects should be forced to be named as beta?  I&#8217;d say that every new project should have a development period, a public beta release period (maybe 3 months), and then an evaluation on if it should be continued as an official Gentoo project.</p>
<p>At the moment it seems as if everyone has a great idea, names it &#8220;Gentoo This&#8221; or &#8220;Gentoo That&#8221; and is able to launch it as a project.  The barrier to entry should be slightly higher and there needs to be an evaluation to see if it&#8217;s just a waste of time and resources to continue the project.  If the project is just a small toy project for a few developers and has little use for anyone else then it shouldn&#8217;t be an official Gentoo project.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: N-S</title>
		<link>http://www.datanode.net/?p=281&#038;cpage=1#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>N-S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Sep 2006 03:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.datanode.net/?p=281#comment-80</guid>
		<description>YES!
This is so to the point.
I love gentoo, and that all devs (and users) are so darn inventive and creative, but hyping new things that don&#039;t exist is just a waste of everyone&#039;s time. I was pleased to see the Seeds project come so fast after just a few days after the first mention of it (in my eyes, that is - people may have discussed it for a long time) but there is still nothing there! A projekt that doesn&#039;t have even a base of a product isn&#039;t a &quot;Gentoo Projekt&quot;. It&#039;s an idea! &quot;Show me the money&quot; works for me too. Promises don&#039;t turn me on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YES!<br />
This is so to the point.<br />
I love gentoo, and that all devs (and users) are so darn inventive and creative, but hyping new things that don&#8217;t exist is just a waste of everyone&#8217;s time. I was pleased to see the Seeds project come so fast after just a few days after the first mention of it (in my eyes, that is &#8211; people may have discussed it for a long time) but there is still nothing there! A projekt that doesn&#8217;t have even a base of a product isn&#8217;t a &#8220;Gentoo Projekt&#8221;. It&#8217;s an idea! &#8220;Show me the money&#8221; works for me too. Promises don&#8217;t turn me on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
